You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Scan barcode
emilydee's review against another edition
informative
inspiring
4.5
I thought I pretty much knew what this book was going to be about but I ended up finding it very interesting and enlightening and surprising and it’s very clear how it became as influential as it did. Also didn’t realize how bad the lack of personhood for women was and how much worse things got from after the first wave to the time of the feminine mystique and how progress can be undone…. Erm gulp. Really liked the long sections of interview excerpts with the housewives.
common_household_mom's review against another edition
challenging
dark
informative
reflective
slow-paced
3.5
Sometimes out of date, but at times her description of 1950s America stands exactly for today’s America in 2025, point-blank. I skimmed and skipped parts of it. I believe that when this book was published it was a society-changer.
I read it mostly as an amazed onlooker – I was raised with almost none of the described restrictions on my life goals, almost none of the described pressure to do only “feminine” things. Intellect and learning was highly prized in my family, and there was no notion that I would be less a female for pursuing them. Home cooking was also highly prized and both my father and my mother demonstrated the delights of cooking. But I greatly fear my country , for all the strides we have made, has now entered a very dark time for women.
I think by the time I reached adulthood, Friedan and others had already implemented change for women in this country. And yet, at my first corporate job in 1985, I was usually the only woman in a room full of 30+ men, all of them with a more powerful and more lucrative job than I had. Those men, the same age as me (in my 20s) would sometimes assume I was only there to make photocopies for them. Make your own photocopies! The misogyny has always been there. Perhaps it had faded to the background, but it looks like it has the power now.
The problem that Friedan calls “feminine mystique” is the lack of positive self-identity among a large swath of American women, most specifically housewives (but the unstated subtext in the book implies “white middle-class women”) of the 1950s and early 1960s. “A sense of emptiness, non-existence, nothingness”.
Friedan details how this feminine mystique comes from advertisers, capitalism’s need to always create more consumption, the faulty popularization of Freud’s grossly mistaken ideas, Margaret Mead, and more.
The section where Friedan discusses homosexuality is abhorrently wrong, and mars the whole book. NO. I had to skim this part because I was so disgusted by it, so forgive me if I’m actually misinterpreting what she said. She seems to blame homosexuality (as if it is a problem that requires blame) on the way some mothers (no mention of fathers) raised their sons (and the emphasis is vastly on homosexual men) is what made them gay. No, no, no.
But most of the book is spot on and, sadly, still applies today. It was truly painful to read the afterwords, written 10 to 35 years later, which detail all the gains women made, and how the right to an abortion was assured. In the 1997 afterword Friedan wrote: “New birth-control technology even beyond RU486, as well as the evolving national consensus, will soon make the whole issue of abortion obsolete.” As of this writing, Jan 31, 2025, the access to those drugs is severely threatened nationwide, even despite a fairly wide national consensus that access to abortion should be available.
What is going to become of us now?
Moderate: Addiction, Alcoholism, and Sexism
rexmanningday's review against another edition
5.0
i recommend this for any woman out there, and men too. it is full of enlightening anecdotes, interesting information, innovative and bright ideas...
yes it is about feminism, but really, it's about equality. there is only one section that crosses the line, and there are a few brief ideas that tiptoe near it. but overall, the book covers and envelops a necessary subject for society, one that is basically as relevant today as it was when it was originally published-- sixty years ago... further proving the necessity of discussing this topic and the need for destroying "the obsolete feminine and masculine sex roles that dehumanized sex, making it almost impossible for women and men to make love, not war."
yes it is about feminism, but really, it's about equality. there is only one section that crosses the line, and there are a few brief ideas that tiptoe near it. but overall, the book covers and envelops a necessary subject for society, one that is basically as relevant today as it was when it was originally published-- sixty years ago... further proving the necessity of discussing this topic and the need for destroying "the obsolete feminine and masculine sex roles that dehumanized sex, making it almost impossible for women and men to make love, not war."
dr_dumpling's review against another edition
4.0
I picked this up because, when I admitted I'd never read it, my former French professor announced, "For shame! It's one of the books that changes your life!" And it really does--despite its very white feminist POV, it's put so much into perspective and made me grateful for the opportunities I have today.
splashforthewin's review against another edition
4.0
"It took, and still takes, extraordinary strength of purpose for women to pursue their own life plans when society does not expect it of them" (pg. 454).
I'm shocked how much a Second Wave Feminist book from 1963 is still relevant today. I thought this book would feel more dated -- and trust me, her ignorant speculations about Autistic and LGBT individuals definitely feel abrasive -- but as far as Feminism goes, change is still slow and uneven.
Friedan can, at times, be a bit repetitive, especially near the end. But her prose is sharp and translucent. You can still feel the truth bombs detonating on the fortress of the American Feminine Mystique -- the fact that a woman is actually an autonomous person who can determine her life's purpose, that pursuing a passion / profession won't lead her children into psychoses, that having a world outside the home will actually help her be healthy and happy. It's still such an important and foundational idea that this book retains its value just on that argument alone.
I wish Friedan had used more on the empirical studies for making her conclusions, as she sometimes instead relies on anecdotal evidence, but it's possible that the studies simply didn't exist at the time. The stories certainly become strong examples, but studies would have helped make a stronger case for hard-nose doubters. Thankfully we now live in a world that has more evidence to help back her up.
I'm shocked how much a Second Wave Feminist book from 1963 is still relevant today. I thought this book would feel more dated -- and trust me, her ignorant speculations about Autistic and LGBT individuals definitely feel abrasive -- but as far as Feminism goes, change is still slow and uneven.
Friedan can, at times, be a bit repetitive, especially near the end. But her prose is sharp and translucent. You can still feel the truth bombs detonating on the fortress of the American Feminine Mystique -- the fact that a woman is actually an autonomous person who can determine her life's purpose, that pursuing a passion / profession won't lead her children into psychoses, that having a world outside the home will actually help her be healthy and happy. It's still such an important and foundational idea that this book retains its value just on that argument alone.
I wish Friedan had used more on the empirical studies for making her conclusions, as she sometimes instead relies on anecdotal evidence, but it's possible that the studies simply didn't exist at the time. The stories certainly become strong examples, but studies would have helped make a stronger case for hard-nose doubters. Thankfully we now live in a world that has more evidence to help back her up.
sachinka's review against another edition
2.0
I actually only made it halfway through. Interesting information, very dry read though.
stacygiven's review against another edition
4.0
I came to the startling realization recently that, despite it being a landmark work which I have been hearing about my whole life, I had never actually read this book. So I picked it up. It must be admitted that I fully expected to find it dated, cliche, and quaint at the most. I was quite surprised (and maybe a bit disturbed) to find how relevant it still is. It must, of course, be read with understanding of its historical context, Friedan's life, and understanding of how the book's age impacts the content. Basically the entirety of chapter 12, "Progressive Dehumanization", made me cringe and there are plenty of other things in the book that can be easily criticized with our half-century of hindsight.
However, the important thing is that this book still resonated with me in a big way. I was born into a world that had already accepted much of what Friedan presented; into a generation that had the privledge to take for granted what feminism had earned for us. Yet, within the pages I still found myself, my parents, my in-laws, my friends, even teenagers that I know. The relevance is eerie. The 1950's woman is so far removed from the 2017 woman. So why are her shadows still everywhere?
This book is a powerhouse. It is clear why it accomplished what it did. I found it, for the most part, very insightful. It is clear now, however, that there is more to the story that perhaps Friedan did not realize at the time. Nonetheless, this is an important work and one not to be dismissed.
However, the important thing is that this book still resonated with me in a big way. I was born into a world that had already accepted much of what Friedan presented; into a generation that had the privledge to take for granted what feminism had earned for us. Yet, within the pages I still found myself, my parents, my in-laws, my friends, even teenagers that I know. The relevance is eerie. The 1950's woman is so far removed from the 2017 woman. So why are her shadows still everywhere?
This book is a powerhouse. It is clear why it accomplished what it did. I found it, for the most part, very insightful. It is clear now, however, that there is more to the story that perhaps Friedan did not realize at the time. Nonetheless, this is an important work and one not to be dismissed.
juliannevarghese's review against another edition
3.0
I’m going to start with the bad. This book has some glaring blind spots. Its discussion of homosexuality is horribly offensive and ill-informed. It either ignores race altogether or uses harmful ethnic stereotypes and comparisons. The chapters are long and her explanations are repetitive. She could have said the same thing just as effectively in about half the time with a good edit. Now, on to the good. A lot of what Friedan has to say was groundbreaking at the time and her discussion of the commodification of women still holds true today. This is an artifact of an earlier feminist movement and anyone reading that should read it for what it is—a relic of an earlier time.